Guides · Relationship stages
The honeymoon phase: how long it lasts, and what comes next
That giddy, can’t-stop-texting feeling is real, and it does change. Here’s what studies of real couples say about how long it lasts, why it fades, and what the couples who thrive afterward have in common.
By The Couples Company10 min read17 sources

The short version
- There’s no set expiry date: in newlyweds, the giddiest part often starts to ease within a year or two, but couples vary a lot.1,2
- A calmer stage is normal. In a 13-year study of newlyweds, what set couples headed for divorce apart was steep disillusionment, not the usual dip.1
- Romantic love without the anxious, obsessive edge can last, and it’s strongly linked to satisfaction in long relationships.3
- Across 43 couples studies, top predictors of relationship quality included feeling sure of your partner’s commitment, appreciation, sexual satisfaction and conflict.4
- In a 10-week experiment, married couples who did exciting things together came away more satisfied than couples who did merely pleasant ones.5
What is the honeymoon phase?
The honeymoon phase is the early, intense stretch of a relationship, when you think about each other constantly and even their quirks seem adorable. There’s no set expiry date, but the most intense part often starts to ease within a year or two: in one small study, the hormone changes of new love had disappeared when people were retested 12 to 24 months later,6 and in newlyweds, declines in love and affection were clearest in the first year of marriage.1 Couples vary a lot, though,2 and in a random sample of married Americans, 40% of those married more than 10 years said they were “very intensely in love.”7
Strictly speaking, honeymoons belong to newlyweds, and many of the studies below follow newly married couples. But people use the phrase for the start of any relationship. Researchers call the feeling passionate love: an intense longing for the other person, with an obsessive edge of intrusive thoughts, uncertainty and mood swings.3
It shows up in the body, too. When 17 people who had been intensely in love for 1 to 17 months looked at their partner’s photo during a brain scan, dopamine-rich areas tied to reward and motivation became more active.8 And in a small study of 24 people who had fallen in love within the previous six months, the stress hormone cortisol ran higher than in people who weren’t newly in love. When they were tested again 12 to 24 months later, the hormone differences were gone.6
How long does the honeymoon phase last?
We couldn’t find a study that pins it to a set number of months, so be wary of anyone who quotes one. What researchers have done is track different parts of the glow over time, and the results point the same rough way: an early high, a gradual settling, and very different paths for different couples.
| What was tracked | Who was studied | What happened |
|---|---|---|
| The hormones of new love | 24 people who had fallen in love within the past six months6 | Their hormone differences from other people were gone when they were retested 12 to 24 months later |
| Love and affection | 168 newlywed couples in Pennsylvania, followed for about 13 years1 | Declines often began soon after the wedding and were clearest in the first year |
| Marriage satisfaction | 232 newlywed couples in Los Angeles, followed for four years2 | It started high and dipped on average, but as many as four in five spouses stayed fairly steady |
| Relationship satisfaction | 165 samples with more than 165,000 people, combined in one analysis9 | Within couples, the biggest drops came early; comparing couples by how long they’d been together, it was lowest around year 10 and higher around year 20 |
| Life satisfaction overall | 1,761 people in Germany who married, and stayed married, during a 15-year study10 | A small boost around the wedding, back to their usual level after about five years on average |
None of these is a stopwatch. Put together, they suggest the head-over-heels feeling tends to soften within the first couple of years, satisfaction drifts down on average, and the averages hide plenty of couples who barely dip at all.2
What are the signs the honeymoon phase is over?
The clearest sign is that your partner starts to feel familiar rather than thrilling. That can feel like a loss, but it’s mostly a change of gear. Some everyday versions:
- You no longer refresh your messages every five minutes, and a night apart feels restful instead of tragic.
- Their habits come into focus: how they load the dishwasher, how they chew, how they narrate every plot twist.
- Desire takes more intention. Researchers note that sexual desire is often intense early on and tends to decline as partners get to know each other.11
- You have your first real disagreements and find out how each of you fights.
- The sweatpants come out, and so do the bad moods. Nobody’s performing anymore.
- Dates need planning instead of just happening.
Why it happens comes down to new becoming familiar. In Robert Sternberg’s triangular theory of love, passion rises fast and peaks early, then settles at a steadier level as you get used to each other. In relationships that work, he argued, the bond underneath keeps growing, even when you notice it less day to day.12
It’s not a bad trade, either. In a study of 136 people at different phases of their relationships, intimacy was higher the further along people were, and constructive ways of handling disagreements were more common in established relationships.13
Does the end of the honeymoon phase mean something’s wrong?
Not by itself. In the 13-year Pennsylvania study, couples who stayed married generally became less affectionate and less in love over the first two years too, and the researchers suggest those couples likely saw it as a natural shift from romance to a working partnership.1
What set couples headed for divorce apart was disillusionment: love fading, affection dropping off, a growing sense that their partner wasn’t responsive, and rising ambivalence.1 A bigger honeymoon didn’t guarantee a safer marriage, either.
The couples who divorced after seven or more years had been unusually affectionate newlyweds, showing about a third more affection than couples who ended up happily married, before a steep drop in their first year. Couples who divorced early were already struggling two months after the wedding.1
The Los Angeles study found something similar from another angle. Spouses on the least satisfied paths tended to start marriage with more stress, more aggression and more negative personality traits, and showed less interest, affection and humor when they talked through problems. Demographic background didn’t separate the groups.2
What comes after the honeymoon phase?
Often a steadier, deeper kind of love, and for many couples, romance that lasts without the anxiety. Researchers separate the obsessive side of early love (the intrusive thoughts and uncertainty) from romantic love itself: intensity, engagement and sexual interest.3
In a review of 25 studies, romantic love without the obsession was strongly linked to satisfaction in both short-term and long-term relationships. Obsession was slightly positive in short-term relationships and slightly negative in long-term ones, and companionate love, the warm, friendship kind, was more strongly tied to satisfaction in long-term relationships.3
Lasting romance isn’t rare, either. In that random sample of married Americans, 40% of people married more than 10 years said they were very intensely in love, and in a second random sample, from New York, 29% did. The things that went with it: thinking positively about each other, thinking about each other when apart, affection and sex, doing new and challenging things together, and being happy with life in general.7
Some long-married brains even look like new love. When 17 people married an average of 21 years who reported being intensely in love viewed their partner’s photo, the same dopamine-rich reward areas seen in early love became more active, along with areas tied to attachment.14 And longer isn’t simply worse: across 165 samples, satisfaction was lowest on average among couples about 10 years in, and higher among couples about 20 years in.9
What helps couples thrive after the honeymoon phase?
Mostly everyday things. A machine-learning study of 43 longitudinal couples studies found the strongest relationship-specific predictors of relationship quality were feeling that your partner is committed, appreciation, sexual satisfaction, feeling that your partner is satisfied, and conflict.4
One honest caveat: how relationships changed over the course of those studies was much harder to predict than where they stood at the start,4 which is good news in its way. The next few years aren’t written yet.
Two more findings are worth knowing. In two studies, people whose partners usually met their good news with enthusiasm reported more intimacy and higher daily marital satisfaction.15 And among the Los Angeles newlyweds, aggression went with rockier paths, while interest, affection and humor during disagreements went with steadier ones.2
- 1
Say thank you for ordinary things
The coffee, the bins, the call they made so you didn’t have to. Appreciation was one of the strongest predictors in that 43-study analysis.4
- 2
Celebrate their wins out loud
When they share good news, stop, ask questions and be glad with them. Enthusiastic responses are the kind linked to more intimacy.15
- 3
Make your commitment visible
Talk about plans that include both of you. Feeling sure of a partner’s commitment was among the strongest predictors, too.4
- 4
Keep desire on the agenda
Desire tends to fade as partners get to know each other,11 so give it some deliberate attention instead of waiting for it to show up.
- 5
Can you get the honeymoon phase back?
You can’t rewind to month three, but you can bring back some of the spark, and there’s good experimental evidence for one approach in particular: doing new things together. Not fancier things. New ones.
In three lab experiments, couples who spent seven minutes on a task that was new and a little exciting reported a bigger rise in relationship quality than couples given a more mundane task.16 In a 10-week experiment with 53 married couples, those assigned to spend 90 minutes a week on activities they found exciting ended up more satisfied than those assigned activities they found pleasant. Doing things together wasn’t enough on its own; the excitement made the difference.5
It works outside the lab, too. In a randomized trial with 101 couples, a four-week online program that encouraged 90 minutes a week of exciting shared activities raised excitement and satisfaction, and couples were still above their starting point four months later.17 A set of three studies in 2019 linked these self-expanding activities (new, mind-stretching things you do together) to higher sexual desire, which in turn went with greater satisfaction.11
- 1
Make two lists
Each of you writes five things you’ve never done together. Small counts: a new trail, a cooking class, a neighborhood you’ve never walked.
- 2
- 3
Take turns choosing
Alternate weeks so each of you gets to surprise the other. Pick new over fancy.
- 4
Talk about it after
On the way home, each of you names one thing that surprised you. It turns an outing into a conversation.
Stuck for ideas? Start with our 101 date night ideas, or stay in with at-home date nights that still feel new.
- I love how comfortable we are now. Can we keep a little adventure in it too?
- What’s something you’ve always wanted to try that we’ve never done?
- I noticed how you handled that today. Thank you.
- I miss our early dates. Want to plan something new this month?
Questions people ask
Is the honeymoon phase real?
Why does the honeymoon phase end?
Do couples with a more intense honeymoon phase last longer?
Is it the honeymoon phase or real love?
Does every couple have a honeymoon phase?
Sources
Every number and finding in this guide comes from these sources, so you can check our work.
- 1.Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 237 to 252. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.237Study
- 2.Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1171 to 1187. doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.xStudy
- 3.Acevedo, B. P., & Aron, A. (2009). Does a long-term relationship kill romantic love? Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 59 to 65. doi.org/10.1037/a0014226Review
- 4.Joel, S., Eastwick, P. W., Allison, C. J., et al. (2020). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 19061 to 19071. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917036117Study
- 5.Reissman, C., Aron, A., & Bergen, M. R. (1993). Shared activities and marital satisfaction: Causal direction and self-expansion versus boredom. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 243 to 254. doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000205Study
- 6.Marazziti, D., & Canale, D. (2004). Hormonal changes when falling in love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(7), 931 to 936. doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2003.08.006Study
- 7.O’Leary, K. D., Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Huddy, L., & Mashek, D. (2012). Is long-term love more than a rare phenomenon? If so, what are its correlates? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 241 to 249. doi.org/10.1177/1948550611417015Study
- 8.Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(1), 327 to 337. doi.org/10.1152/jn.00838.2004Study
- 9.Bühler, J. L., Krauss, S., & Orth, U. (2021). Development of relationship satisfaction across the life span: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(10), 1012 to 1053. doi.org/10.1037/bul0000342Review
- 10.Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527 to 539. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527Study
- 11.Muise, A., Harasymchuk, C., Day, L. C., Bacev-Giles, C., Gere, J., & Impett, E. A. (2019). Broadening your horizons: Self-expanding activities promote desire and satisfaction in established romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 237 to 258. doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000148Study
- 12.Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119 to 135. doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119Review
- 13.Reese-Weber, M. (2015). Intimacy, communication, and aggressive behaviors: Variations by phases of romantic relationship development. Personal Relationships, 22(2), 204 to 215. doi.org/10.1111/pere.12074Study
- 14.Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145 to 159. doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq092Study
- 15.Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228 to 245. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228Study
- 16.Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 273 to 284. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.273Study
- 17.Coulter, K., & Malouff, J. M. (2013). Effects of an intervention designed to enhance romantic relationship excitement: A randomized-control trial. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 2(1), 34 to 44. doi.org/10.1037/a0031719Study
How we write our guides. From published research, in plain English, with every source linked. Spotted something we got wrong? Tell us.


