Guides · Connection
Emotional intimacy: what it is and how to build more of it
Emotional intimacy is the feeling that your partner really knows you, and likes what they find. Here’s what the research says builds it (spoiler: lots of small, ordinary moments), how to tell when it’s thinning, and what to try this week.
By The Couples Company11 min read8 sources

The short version
- Emotional intimacy is feeling known, understood and cared for by your partner, and it grows when one of you opens up and the other responds well.1
- In diary studies, the response mattered, not just the sharing: feeling understood and cared for accounted for part of the link between opening up and feeling close.1,2
- Small moments seem to do a lot of the work, from answering a passing comment to getting genuinely excited about your partner’s good news.3,4
- If one of you wants more closeness than the other, aim for a level that works for both of you, and ask in a way that invites rather than chases.
What is emotional intimacy?
Emotional intimacy is the sense that your partner truly knows you: you can show them what’s going on inside (the worries, the hopes, the slightly embarrassing stuff) and trust them to respond with care. Researchers describe it as feeling understood, validated and cared for, and it builds when one of you opens up and the other responds well.1
It isn’t the same as physical intimacy. You can have a great sex life and still feel like roommates when it comes to talking, or feel deeply understood by a partner who lives three time zones away. It also doesn’t mean telling each other everything at once, or spending every waking hour together.
Day to day, emotional intimacy tends to look like this:
- You mention a worry while it’s still small, not once it’s a crisis.
- They remember the thing you were nervous about and ask how it went.
- You can say “I was wrong” or “I’m scared” and trust it’ll be met kindly.
- Your good news goes to them first, and they actually get excited.
- You know what kind of support they want after a bad day: advice, a hug or just company.
- You can share a quiet evening without either of you wondering what’s wrong.
How does emotional intimacy develop?
Emotional intimacy develops in a loop: one of you shares something real, the other responds in a way that feels understanding and caring, and over many rounds you both come to feel known. Psychologists Reis and Shaver proposed this loop in 1988 as the interpersonal process model of intimacy. Our summary of it follows a 1998 study that put the model to the test.1
In their model, a good response does three things. It shows you understood what was said, it validates the person (you’re accepted and valued) and it shows you care.1 The twist is that what counts most is how the response lands for the person who shared, not what the listener actually said.1 You can mean well and still miss.
Two honest caveats: these studies show links rather than proof of cause, and the married couples were volunteers from a mostly rural area who were largely white and well educated.2 Still, the lesson is practical: sharing is necessary, but not enough on its own.2 The response is the other half.
Why do small moments matter so much?
Small moments matter because they’re constant: a comment about something funny online, a sigh at the laptop, a text that just says “guess what.” Each one is a tiny invitation, and in the intimacy model, closeness builds up across many of these exchanges over time.1
Researchers Janice Driver and John Gottman filmed 49 newlywed couples spending a day in an apartment-style lab, then coded ten minutes of each couple’s dinner.3 Every attempt to interact counted as a bid, and each response was sorted as turning toward it, turning away or turning against it.3 Couples with more playful bids at dinner also shared more humor when they discussed a disagreement in a separate session, and each partner’s enthusiastic responses went with more affection from the other.3 It was a small, correlational study, and the authors read it as early support for the idea that couples build intimacy through hundreds of very ordinary moments.3
Good news is a bid with extra weight. In one study of 59 dating couples and another of 89 married couples, people who said their partner usually met their good news with real enthusiasm reported more intimacy and satisfaction.4 The surprise was the quiet, supportive “that’s nice”: it went with lower relationship quality, not higher, just like dismissive or deflating replies did.4 And when researchers filmed 79 dating couples taking turns sharing recent good and bad news, how partners handled the good news was more closely tied to relationship well-being and breakups two months later than how they handled the bad.5
| Response type | Sounds like | What they hear |
|---|---|---|
| Active and constructive | “No way! Tell me everything. How did they tell you?” | I’m thrilled, and I want to relive it with you. |
| Passive and constructive | “Oh, nice. Good for you.” (Eyes still on the phone.) | Fine, but not that interesting. |
| Active and destructive | “Great, so you’ll be working even later now?” | Your win is my problem. |
| Passive and destructive | “Did you remember to call the landlord?” | I didn’t really hear you. |
What are the signs of emotional intimacy, and of it fading?
The clearest sign of emotional intimacy is that you can be yourself with your partner, including the anxious, silly or not-so-proud parts, and expect a kind response. The clearest sign it’s fading is the opposite: you start filtering what you say, or saving the real stuff for someone else.
| Moment | When it’s strong | When it’s thinning |
|---|---|---|
| Good news | They hear it first, and they get excited | It goes to the group chat first |
| A bad day | You can say what you need | You handle it alone and say “I’m fine” |
| Conversation | Some of it is about the two of you | Mostly schedules, bills and who’s buying milk |
| Small bids | Comments and sighs get noticed | They often go unanswered, both ways |
| Disagreements | You can disagree and still feel like a team | You skip topics to keep the peace |
| The feeling | You feel known | You feel lonely in the same room |
One flat week isn’t a verdict. Distance can creep in during busy, stressful stretches (a new baby, a brutal job, a move), and it can lift when life calms down. What’s worth a conversation is a pattern that lasts for months, or a loneliness that doesn’t go away.
How do you build emotional intimacy?
You build emotional intimacy the way it naturally grows: share a little more of what’s going on inside, respond a little better when your partner does, and repeat often. None of this needs a weekend retreat. Most of it fits into a Tuesday night.
- 1
Catch the small bids
When your partner starts a sentence, turns their screen toward you or sighs at the sink, look up. A quick “What’s up?” turns toward the bid. A grunt at your phone turns away from it.
- 2
Make a fuss over good news
Ask a follow-up question, let them tell the story twice and celebrate like it matters, because to them it does. In the good-news studies, the enthusiastic response was the only kind linked to better relationship quality.4
- 3
Add one feeling to the facts
“I had the review” is information. “I had the review, and I was more nervous than I let on” is an invitation. In the diary research, sharing emotions predicted closeness more than sharing facts did.1
- 4
Check that it landed
Since what matters is how your response feels on the other end, ask. “Did I get that right?” or “Do you want ideas, or should I just listen?” saves a lot of well-meant misses.
- 5
Go deeper, a little at a time
In a well-known 1997 study, pairs of strangers spent 45 minutes on 36 questions and tasks that grew gradually more personal, and they felt closer afterward than pairs who made small talk.6 They were strangers, and the researchers were aiming for a temporary feeling of closeness, not an actual relationship.6 But the recipe is easy to borrow: take turns, both answer and go slowly. Our deep questions for couples are made for exactly this, and the intimate questions go further when you’re ready.
- 6
Keep a tiny daily check-in
Ten minutes, phones in another room: the best part of your day, the hardest part and one thing you can’t wait for. It sounds almost too simple, which is exactly why it survives busy weeks.
- 7
Play together, too
Closeness isn’t all heavy talks. In the newlywed study, playful moments at dinner (good-natured teasing and horseplay) went with more shared humor during a disagreement.3 No game required, but on a night when deep questions feel like a lot, a light game like WhoIs?, our card game for couples, is an easy way to get talking about each other.
- Wait, back up. Tell me that part again.
- You seem a bit quiet. Want to talk, or want company?
- That sounds really frustrating. I’d be annoyed too.
- I’m so proud of you. How did it feel when you found out?
- Can I tell you something I’ve been a little nervous to say?
- Did I get that right, or am I missing something?
- Thanks for telling me. I like knowing what’s going on with you.
What if one of you wants more emotional intimacy than the other?
If one of you wants more closeness than the other, nothing is broken: people genuinely differ in how much closeness they want.7 And more isn’t automatically better.
In a two-year study of people in relationships, those whose actual closeness matched the closeness they wanted reported the best relationship well-being and mental health, whatever that level happened to be.7 People whose closeness moved toward their ideal over time reported improvements, and those with little or no gap were less likely to break up.7 So the goal isn’t maximum togetherness. It’s a level that works for both of you.
The trap is the chase. One partner pushes for more, the other pulls back, so the first pushes harder. In the married-couples diary study, spouses who reported more of this push and pull (researchers call it demand-withdraw) felt less close day to day, on average.2 A review of 74 studies with more than 14,000 participants linked the pattern, moderately, to less satisfying relationships, and its authors note the two probably feed each other.8 So how you ask matters as much as what you ask for.
- Name the wish, not the flaw. “I miss our long talks” invites a hug. “You never talk to me” invites a debate.
- Make it small and specific. “Ten minutes after dinner” is easier to say yes to than “be more open.”
- Ask what closeness looks like for them. Some people feel closest talking face to face. Others feel it side by side, cooking, walking or driving somewhere.
- If you’re the one who needs space, put a time on it. “Give me until eight to recharge, then the evening’s ours” reassures without giving up the time.
- Pick a calm moment. Not mid-argument, and not as someone’s heading out the door.
- I’ve been missing you lately, even though we see each other every day.
- I’m not upset with you. I just want more of us.
- What makes you feel close to me? I’d rather know than guess.
- Could we try ten minutes of real talk after dinner this week and see how it feels?
- I need a bit of quiet after work. Then I’d love to hear about your day.
- When I push, it’s because I miss you, not because you’re doing it wrong.
If one of you tends to pull away when things get close, or feels uneasy without lots of reassurance, our guides to avoidant attachment and anxious attachment go deeper. And if the same conversation keeps going in circles, a couples counselor can help you both feel heard. That’s a smart move, not a last resort.
Questions people ask
What is an example of emotional intimacy?
Can a relationship survive without emotional intimacy?
What is the difference between emotional and physical intimacy?
What are the 36 questions?
How do you get emotional intimacy back?
Sources
Every number and finding in this guide comes from these sources, so you can check our work.
- 1.Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238 to 1251. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238Study
- 2.Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314 to 323. doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314Study
- 3.Driver, J. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2004). Daily marital interactions and positive affect during marital conflict among newlywed couples. Family Process, 43(3), 301 to 314. doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00024.xStudy
- 4.Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228 to 245. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228Study
- 5.Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 904 to 917. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904Study
- 6.Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 363 to 377. doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234003Study
- 7.Frost, D. M., & Forrester, C. (2013). Closeness discrepancies in romantic relationships: Implications for relational well-being, stability, and mental health. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(4), 456 to 469. doi.org/10.1177/0146167213476896Study
- 8.Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Shimkowski, J. R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81(1), 28 to 58. doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.813632Review
How we write our guides. From published research, in plain English, with every source linked. Spotted something we got wrong? Tell us.


